Quote from: JoeQuaker on 07/26/2018, 03:50 PMI'd like that Ys III CD if you still have it. Sent PM with my location.Sorry for the delay. Been out of town for a week and a half. PM sent.
![]() |
No, NOT a trick, a Halloween treat! Presenting the Dead of the Brain 1 English patch by David Shadoff for the DEAD last official PC Engine CD game published by NEC before exiting the console biz in 1999! I helped edit/betatest and it's also a game I actually finished in 2023, yaaay! Shubibiman also did a French localization. |
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: JoeQuaker on 07/26/2018, 03:50 PMI'd like that Ys III CD if you still have it. Sent PM with my location.Sorry for the delay. Been out of town for a week and a half. PM sent.
Quote from: TR0N on 06/13/2018, 05:37 PMFOTNS game for PS4 is coming to the U.SLooks pretty damn cool. Seems closer to the PS1 HnK game by Banpresto than Ken's Rage, which I think is a good thing. Just wish HnK 2 would get more love.
Quote from: NightWolve on 04/03/2018, 08:30 PMAnother 80's gem that doesn't last on YouTube for long, can't find the music video anymore.Love Boys of Summer. Takes me back to the 1985-1990 living in Daytona Beach, FL. Best time of my life living down there. Just turned 40 and damn it sucks getting older.
Quote from: TR0N on 06/18/2018, 12:20 AMCool, I didn't know it was coming out on BR. Definitely have to pick it up. Looks like there aren't many extras on it, though the original Japanese ending is on there. I had wanted to get the FOTNS tv series on BR but I had read that the picture quality wasn't any better than the DVD release. What did you think of the BR picture quality?Quote from: RyuHayabusa on 06/17/2018, 07:27 PMSpeaking of FOTNS it has just been released again on BR looking to buying this release.That will round it out since i all ready have the tv series on BR.Quote from: SignOfZeta on 06/16/2018, 03:21 PMFist of the North Star
http://www.amazon.com/Fist-North-Star-Movie-Blu-ray/dp/B07CDCF335/
Quote from: SignOfZeta on 06/16/2018, 03:21 PMI probably would have gotten the Robot Carnival BR if they hadn't decided to crop the thing to wide screen. I know they say it was "always meant to be" wide but I've been watching it for decades in with the variable ratios, usually 4:3 so it would probably drive me nuts to watch it cropped.Interesting. Over the years I've watched Robot Carnival many times, especially Deprive and Presence, my two favorite segments, and I did not even notice the BR release was cropped. I did enjoy the interview about Streamline Pictures a lot. Say what you will about Carl Macek, what he did to introduce anime to America was considerable. To this day most of my favorite anime was released by Streamline, including Robot Carnival, Fist of the North Star, Golgo 13, Akira, and Vampire Hunter D. I still have a few nagging questions about Presence that I guess will never be answered, like why is the protagonist's wife's face obscured, why does he stare at the dumpster full of robot parts, and a few others. Does he use parts from the robot dumpster to finish the "Uemetsu's Fantasy Girl"?
QuoteThat's a pipe dream that won't amount to much. Taxes are nothing compared to labor costs.We'll see.
QuoteIf you'd bother to look at a normalized chart of the DOW since its lowest point in 2009 up to present, you'd see that it's nicely improved under Trump but hardly skyrocketed. The DOW gains aren't all Obama but neither are they all Trump; if it were another year of Obama's average, it'd be somewhere around 23000.Bullshit. The Dow is up nearly 7,000 points since Trump won the election. It jumped 1,500 between the election and the inauguration and will probably cross 25,000 tomorrow. Keep in mind that when Obama took office it was pretty already at the bottom with nowhere to go but up. An injection of a trillion dollars, started by G.W. Bush, is what got the market climbing again. Poo poo it all you want but it's no coincidence that the markets have skyrocketed the way they have since Nov. 9th.
QuoteIf you weren't such a crybaby bitch, you'd have followed the link and found that they DO talk about Obama's golf too. We all know that Obama (and Bush, Clinton, etc.) golfed and spent lots of money on personal travel, but the fact is that Trump is doing both at a faster clip than any previous president. It's not hypocrisy to mock the dotard after he bitched REPEATEDLY about Obama's golfing and vacationing and promising that he would do neither.I did follow the link, dipshit. Couldn't help but notice how they got busted with their bullshit numbers on how much Trump was costing taxpayers and had to admit to it. However, as I mentioned before Trump, unlike Obama, Bush, Clinton, etc. actually owns multiple vacation homes with golf courses. He did say he wouldn't play golf or vacation like Obama, which he has done. No denying that bit of hypocrisy. At least he wasn't golfing 15 minutes after announcing to America that one of our people had been beheaded.
Quote from: seieienbu on 01/03/2018, 02:22 PMWell that didn't last long. Utter nonsense? I have yet to see you refute anything I've said. You've yet to actually engage what I've said and instead you just whine like a liberal bitch. You and your liberal fuck buddies just keep attacking the strawman image of Trump that the media has created to incite hysteria about him being the a white supremacist, hating the poor, etc etc etc. And for the record I used to be a centrist. I hated George W. Bush because of the war in Iraq and how much religion was being tied to politics since I'm an atheist. However, the left has gone absolutely insane. The entire goal of liberalism today is to tear down every aspect of Western Civilization in the name of diversity and guilt and rebuild it into some communist hellhole.Quote from: guest on 01/02/2018, 10:40 AMIf you weren't such a crybaby bitch, you'd have followed the link and found that they DO talk about Obama's golf too. We all know that Obama (and Bush, Clinton, etc.) golfed and spent lots of money on personal travel, but the fact is that Trump is doing both at a faster clip than any previous president. It's not hypocrisy to mock the dotard after he bitched REPEATEDLY about Obama's golfing and vacationing and promising that he would do neither.Given the utter nonsense he's been posting I doubt very highly he more than skims anything that he's actively arguing against. I'd wager the odds of him actually reading an outside source is slim to nil. Why would RyuHayabusa bother actively engaging when he can just cry victim while making personal character attacks?
Quote from: esteban on 12/29/2017, 09:26 PMI'm getting ready to play Lunar on the PSP. Just finished playing through Castlevania Symphony of the Night on the Saturn. Not the best port due to longer load times, no transparencies, and having to go through the menu to access the map but it's got a few interesting extras not in the PS1 version.Quote from: RyuHayabusa on 12/29/2017, 09:06 PMProposal: what video game should you and I play next? Its not a competition, I just want to talk to you about something else.Quote from: KingDrool on 12/29/2017, 08:53 PMI told you, man, I stopped participating because it was pointless. And yeah, I was guilty of antagonizing behavior, too. The difference here is that I realized it and stopped. Im not interested in lobbing shit at people online, nor am I interested in lumping people into libtard/conservatard boxes, or whatever. That sort of childish bullshit is what got us into our current situation with the Twitter Troll in Chief.You talk about 4chan-level bullshit right after calling the president the Twitter Troll in Chief. See, that's what it all boils down to is hypocrisy. You hear all this talk about civility, dignity, and maturity from people who flagrantly insult anyone who disagrees with them by labeling them as racists, sexists, bigots, homophobes, xenophobes, Nazis, white supremacists, etc. I initially didn't want to get in an argument here but sometimes when you see something that's flat out bullshit you can't help but say something. Dude posts some bullshit link talking about how much golf Trump plays all the while ignoring how much golf Obama played or the fact over $100 million was spent on Obama's vacations and travels. I guess he probably didn't even know that but then again how would he since 95% of the media is pro-Obama and anti-Trump.
So no, Im not hiding. Im always happy to have a conversation. You have made a couple valid points, despite them being couched in 4chan-level bullshit. And sure, Nulltard insulted you first. Maybe rise above it. I know Trump likes to hit em back 10 times harder, but itd be nice if people remembered what dignity was, instead of grade school mentality. Maybe wed get somewhere.
I'll agree with you, I wish things were more civilized at times but we're a nation now divided more than at any other time probably since the Civil War.
I have a lot of games, but not everything, so pick a genre or game you were interested in.
I am not a big fan of RPGs, though...
Quote from: BigusSchmuck on 12/29/2017, 11:30 PMA brief history on ISPs douchery:That's a small list. Two of them aren't even from the US. One of them was done to stop illegal file sharing through P2P programs. As for the others, yes, some companies do questionable things but that didn't stop after 2015 either. Companies are always doing things to give themselves advantages and that's why they're taken to court. Like I said before, it's not as though all regulation of the internet is suddenly gone.
https://www.freepress.net/blog/2017/04/25/net-neutrality-violations-brief-history
Makes you wonder if people will have to pay a fee to run their crypto coin miners...
Quote from: KingDrool on 12/29/2017, 08:53 PMI told you, man, I stopped participating because it was pointless. And yeah, I was guilty of antagonizing behavior, too. The difference here is that I realized it and stopped. Im not interested in lobbing shit at people online, nor am I interested in lumping people into libtard/conservatard boxes, or whatever. That sort of childish bullshit is what got us into our current situation with the Twitter Troll in Chief.You talk about 4chan-level bullshit right after calling the president the Twitter Troll in Chief. See, that's what it all boils down to is hypocrisy. You hear all this talk about civility, dignity, and maturity from people who flagrantly insult anyone who disagrees with them by labeling them as racists, sexists, bigots, homophobes, xenophobes, Nazis, white supremacists, etc. I initially didn't want to get in an argument here but sometimes when you see something that's flat out bullshit you can't help but say something. Dude posts some bullshit link talking about how much golf Trump plays all the while ignoring how much golf Obama played or the fact over $100 million was spent on Obama's vacations and travels. I guess he probably didn't even know that but then again how would he since 95% of the media is pro-Obama and anti-Trump.
So no, Im not hiding. Im always happy to have a conversation. You have made a couple valid points, despite them being couched in 4chan-level bullshit. And sure, Nulltard insulted you first. Maybe rise above it. I know Trump likes to hit em back 10 times harder, but itd be nice if people remembered what dignity was, instead of grade school mentality. Maybe wed get somewhere.
Quote from: Bornist on 12/29/2017, 07:58 PMHaha. So there's like 90 pages worth of you guys calling Trump supporters morons, losers, Nazis, and I'm the fucking bad guy? Give me a break. And last I checked Nulltard insulted me first. But go ahead, run away. Hide under the bed or that evil ol' Trump is going to get you.Quote from: KingDrool on 12/29/2017, 07:24 PMIts why I stopped participating in this thread; its pointless. Internet troll antics wont convince anyone of anything, except that youre an asshole. Unless thats your intent. If so, congrats. Very effective.Yeah, Im doing the same thing. Im bowing out.
Quote from: guest on 12/29/2017, 09:59 AMWhat is it with these ignorant troll cunts? If you have anything even slightly negative to say about Trump or any of his actions, you're automatically labeled a far left wing antifa socialist nutter. There's no middle ground!Seriously? Yeah, I'm the bad guy. The amount of anti-Trump rhetoric on this forum is considerable and in case you haven't noticed, dissenting voices are not very welcome.
QuoteHere's a couple facts for Mr. Anti-regulation:Not against all regulation, just over-regulation.
Quote1. Utilities (water/power/gas/sewer/etc.) in the US are heavily regulated and often publicly owned, and they're generally cheaper and more reliable than what's found in other western countries.America is a much larger country than all those western European and east Asian countries and much less densely populated. City and local governments have too many laws dictating how ISPs upgrade equipment and to top it off is the insane cost to upgrade everything across the US. Even Google with it's tremendous wealth has been extremely slow in rolling out Google Fiber. It costs millions to upgrade each node of the thousands of nodes across the country. That's why the bigger cities are upgraded first since it affects the most people and then later upgrades move to smaller cities. With small countries like the UK it's much easier because there's less to upgrade and less cost. Yes, more competition would help but as stated before it's expensive and local/city governments have laws that stifle competition.
2. Internet service, which net neutrality aimed to treat and regulate like a utility, is far slower and more expensive than what the rest of the world has (through regulation and/or government ownership more often than not).
QuoteI have done research. I dont take this shit lightly. I do not watch MSNBC, or hardly any TV for that matter, especially broadcast news. I dont read huff post or vox (whatever the fuck that is). I like to keep tabs on US politics from international sources mostly.What, you sit around watching Al Jazeera and BBC all day? No wonder you're so misinformed.
QuoteHe (and when I say he, I am including his administration) have begun to DECIMATE rights for the LGBT community.Really? Like what? He said he doesn't mind if some weirdo tranny in a dress uses the women's room at Trump Tower. What else do you want?
QuoteHe has pushed for a near theocracy.Bullshit. I'm an atheist so I know this isn't even close to being true. What, because he's saying Merry Christmas? As a conservative atheist I unfortunately have to deal with the bad reputation atheists have because of all the whacko leftists who want to tear down crosses that have been around for a hundred years because they're "offended".
QuoteHe has sold out what protected areas we have left so they can be developed. He is embracing fossil fuels while the rest of the world is moving on to renewables.He's helping make America energy independent and the world leader in energy production. Face it, there are ZERO renewable sources of energy that plentiful enough or efficient enough to get off of fossil fuels. You know it. I know it. Until something new comes along that isn't going to change.
QuoteHis tax plan has a slight silver lining. Maybe his cut on corporate tax will get some industries to move back to the US.That's the plan, along with expansion of those already here. It's about jobs and keeping American wealth here.
QuoteAs for him taking credit for a lot of the prosperity in the US this past year...sure, right. The DOW was on the way up when Obama was still in office and Trump was daydreaming about ramming his daughter. Jobs were slowly making a comeback.So it's just a coincidence that the Dow has risen nearly 7,000 points since Trump was elected? It just suddenly skyrocketed for no reason. Oh, it was Obama. That's right. An anemic GDP around 1.8% all of a sudden jumps to 3.3%. Coincidence? Or another delayed Obama after effect? Unemployment rate? Yeah, that was already low though it's gotten a bit lower since Trump. However, keep in mind that it's not the real number anyway, as Trump often said on the campaign trail but doesn't mention now.
QuoteNot only is he poor at what he does, he surrounds himself by backwards thinking, ignorant people in his administration.Statistics, massive business successes, and the fact he won the presidency against all odds say he's not poor at what he does. As for the rest, what you call backwards thinking and ignorance I'd call common sense. Not everyone thinks simply putting lipstick on a dude in a dress makes him a woman. Not everyone thinks people who come here illegally should be showered in free government benefits and be let out of prison to roam free after repeatedly committing felonies. Not everyone thinks taxes should be raised on workers to fund free healthcare, education, housing, etc for the entire nation. Not everyone thinks like you do.
QuoteAt least W had a decent administration, albeit morally bankrupt, they at least understood diplomacy and how to keep the country running decently.Seriously? I hated W's eight years. Good guy but woefully ill equipped for the job. Better than Gore though. As for diplomacy, kissing ass and giving away the nation's wealth didn't help anything. Iraq was a mistake. NK kept working on nukes. Terrorism spread around the world. Not a great track record and things didn't get better under Obama. Funny how libs hated W until Trump came around.
QuotePerhaps I could write this in a way that someone from the moral write could relate: For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much requiredGiven? Spoken like a true liberal. Not every rich person was born with money. Not everyone had their wealth given to them. Most wealthy people worked hard for their money, took chances, failed a few times along the way, etc. Yeah, Trump was born into money and then he built it up exponentially but this whole deep seated anti-wealth idea on the left is ridiculous, especially considering most of the leaders of the left are filthy rich themselves.
QuotePoliticians, like Trump, have their stupidly expensive elections paid for by oligarchs like the Koch brothers. The Koch brothers spent $889 million on the 2016 election. Why? Because it makes them money in the long run. If they wouldn't make billions from funding elections then they wouldn't pay for it. I dislike how the mega rich will waste vast sums of money on campaign ads, fake news stories on social media, and overall nothing of worth to save themselves money.
QuoteWhy yes, they Do often pay more money to the US coffers than I do but I honestly don't care. They have more money; vastly more money. If I can pay my taxes then they can pay their capital gains taxes (which are at a lower rate than what I pay) and not decide "It's unfair to me because I'm rich so I should buy some politicians to make things better."Often pay more? Get real. You already know they pay more taxes to the US coffers than you do. Quite whining.
QuoteImmense waste like spending $150k on golf carts at Trump's hotel? Money from taxpayers like me that eventually goes back into Trump's pockets? Yeah, I'd much rather that money went to retired elderly or was spent on medicine and vaccines for poor children. A definition of government waste is essentially every stupid thing Trump does to help himself jerk off to how great of a human being he is.Funny, Democrats didn't care about how much how much money it cost to fly Obama around for 8 years. Now, you do know it cost $105,662,975 for Obama's vacations and travels over his 8 years, right? ONE HUNDERED AND FIVE MILLION DOLLARS. Democrats are so funny. You guys add $10 trillion to the debt then all of a sudden you become deficit hawks when Trump takes office. Give me a break.
QuoteNet Neutrality was an ideal to where all data is treated equally. Repealing it allows data to not be treated equally. Thus, if there's a rival to your business model you can crush them by merely not allowing them to have data and therefore kill them; you no longer need to have competition.The FTC has control over anti-trust issues and apparently NN didn't stop Verizon from doing what you say it's supposed to have stopped. I could be wrong, and if in 5 years I turn out to be then I'll admit it but I can't see ISPs charging more to access this site or that site or having to have multiple services to access all sites. Push back from consumers plus competition would likely stop that from happening.
QuoteDon't get me wrong, the dems don't stand for much of anything at the moment. With that said, as a general rule for the past 30 years or so they've tried to get more for the lower class and not, what, I don't even understand what you're getting at here. Take from the poorest and throw it away?Not true. They've merely used poor people to stay in power all the while running pretty much anything they touch into the ground. Chicago, Baltimore, St. Louis, etc etc etc. Even California, what was the 8th largest economy in the world, is billions of dollars in debt despite it's high taxation because of all their socialist programs. The Dems just use racism, sexism, xenophobia, etc as rallying cries for votes while the spend their states into oblivion.
Quote from: seieienbu on 12/28/2017, 07:04 PMA quick google search points to over half the money going to the super rich. I'd much rather the government keep my tax refund if that means that the rich guys paid taxes.Um, so you do know that the "rich guys" pay the overwhelming majority of taxes, right? The top 1% pays roughly 40% of all income taxes. The top 10% pay roughly 70% while the bottom 50% pay around 3%. Yes, the wealthy have most of the money but they also pay most of the taxes. Why liberals think the rich pay no taxes is beyond me. Someone has to pay for all those child tax credits for the people making under $20,000 with three kids and no high school diploma.
QuoteI want the government to continue paying off social security to all the elderly who paid in. I want the government to provide good schools for children to gain an education. I want the government to have good roads for people to use. I don't want the top 1% to gain a trillion dollars that could have gone to these things.Maybe if the majority of budget spending didn't go towards Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid along with all the immense waste within the government we could do those things, though I'd say in large part our education problems aren't a money issue but rather cultural decline.
Quote from: seieienbu on 12/28/2017, 07:06 PMExplain.Quote from: RyuHayabusa on 12/28/2017, 07:01 PMThe FTC will once again have primary oversight when it comes to protecting consumer's rights and deal with anything that might stifle competition just like before.Maybe you missed out on it (probably due to right-winged lies about how Net Neutrality stifles competition) but the government just did the exact opposite of what you say the FTC will do.
Quote from: Bornist on 12/28/2017, 06:58 PMIf you actually read my post I listed numerous things but I'm not going to waste my time writing a dissertation with "documented backup" when you didn't even read my post. It's up to you to do some research instead of watching MSNBC and looking at the Huffpost and Vox all day.Quote from: RyuHayabusa on 12/28/2017, 05:51 PMI could make a lengthy list of things he and those in his administration have accomplished but really, why bother?Why bother? Because you have a fucking point to make. You cant come into a discussion, say You guys are wrong, but Im not going to actually give examples of why you are wrong. You just are!
List five things that he has done to improve this country since he has been inaugurated. Five, with some sort of documented backup.
Was Obama fantastic? Nope, not even close. But he wasnt a maniacal, egotistical, racist, misogynistic, bafoon.
He is moving this country backwards, in so many ways.
Quote from: guest on 12/28/2017, 06:28 PMBecause ISPs haven't yet done the things net neutrality was meant to protect, it's guaranteed that then never would.... even though such things have already come to pass in other countries? Impeccable logic!Ignorant? In case you haven't noticed the government is slow, wasteful and extremely inefficient though in some areas moreso than others. Hell, the government just spent over $100,000 to teach immigrants how to use Facebook. Like a good socialist though you keep asking for more government, more government. It's not as though there will be zero regulation of the internet. The FTC will once again have primary oversight when it comes to protecting consumer's rights and deal with anything that might stifle competition just like before.
And I always enjoy the tired old saw about how the government fucks up everything they touch. It shows just how ignorant you are.
Quote from: seieienbu on 12/28/2017, 06:15 PMGreat. He's a corporate shill giving big business what they want and he's creating fear where none should be to create a boogeyman enemy to oppose. That's "getting shit done" apparently.Um, not all businesses are big businesses. The tax bill benefits small businesses and they make up the majority of all businesses. You lefties demonize business but they're the job creators. Not everyone can get a posh government job where you can't get fired, make on average more than in the private sector, and get every federal holiday off. Quit watching MSNBC so much. Also, this boogie man you're talking about. You lefties are all a bunch of Neville Chamberlains, thinking you can apologize, appease, or pay off anyone who would do this nation and it's people harm. No need to create an enemy to oppose. Unfortunately there are plenty outside of this country and within as well.
Quote from: seieienbu on 12/28/2017, 05:15 PMI could make a lengthy list of things he and those in his administration have accomplished but really, why bother? If you're even somewhat politically informed you already know what he's done and will either attribute it to Obama (stock market, GDP growth, crushing of ISIS, low unemployment, job growth, consumer confidence, etc), call it racism (decrease in border crossings, gang member arrests, travel ban, US embassy moving to Jerusalem, etc), call it hand outs for the rich and corporations (tax bill, cutting regulations, net neutrality gone, etc), a war on women (rollback of contraceptive mandate in Obamacare, rollback of Mexico City Policy, amending Title IX guidelines, etc), a war on the environment (drilling in Anwar, Keystone, XL pipelines, pulling out of Paris Climate Accord) and whatever else. I'm sure there's an insidious motive behind reforming the VA, pulling out of TPP, decertifying the Iran nuclear deal, and everything else because he's a horrible, racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, transphobic monster, right?Quote from: RyuHayabusa on 12/28/2017, 03:38 PMFace it, Trump is already doing more for this country than Obama did in eight years. While the left just cries racism, sexism, xenophobia, homophobia all day and calls him a Nazi, Stalin, KKK, Trump is actually getting shit done.What "shit" exactly is Trump accomplishing?
Quote from: guest on 12/28/2017, 04:44 PMSame here. I mean, we all trust the government to oversee, regulate, and police everything else it has it's tentacles in, right? More government because they do such a great job. Really, net neutrality really did so much great stuff, didn't it? My internet worked exactly the same way as it did before but my prices went up considerably. Still only one cable company here because of local restrictions that didn't change under NN. The internet grew exponentially before 2015 but never mind that. Once again, it's those evil, greedy, no good rich people at it again screwing over the little guy like they always do. Obama tried to save us but that horrible, evil, racist Trump sided with the rich people. Liberals.Quote from: RyuHayabusa on 12/28/2017, 02:44 PMWow, I can't believe how much the internet has changed since Net Neutrality was voted down. It's almost like 2014 again. Oh the humanity!Quoted for preservation. Will revisit later when things have had enough time to go to shite.
Quote from: jperryss on 11/27/2017, 12:46 PMhttp://trumpgolfcount.com/
QuoteI feel like everything I said in my last post applies directly to this. Even if Walmart does pay its employees more than $7.15/hour, can a person working full time at Wal-mart (or the more common 39.5 hours to ensure that they don't get benefits) afford the things I listed before: rent a single bedroom apartment, make car payments, be able to eat, pay for health care, and have a bit left over for clothes/car insurance/etc.? No, being the kid that brings in the karts from the parking lot shouldn't be your end goal but the company should still pay enough to where someone doing that job full time can live.
QuoteAs stated earlier, Scandinavian countries have the highest standard of living. Perhaps trying to be more like those countries would be a start?
QuoteI feel that America is one of the best places in the world in which to be rich. At the same time, I feel that it is not one of the best places in the world to be in the middle of the pack. I feel that an economic system designed around making the middle class strong and healthy would be ideal. I'm much more concerned about the people in the middle than I am the guy at the top.America is still a great place to be middle class. However, admittedly America has increasingly become like an hourglass, with all the sand being at the top and bottom quickly passing through the middle. I'm all for closing all the loopholes used to avoid paying taxes and implementing policies to discourage sending jobs out of the country. I do feel that many corporations have screwed America over and bolstered rival nations like China at the expense of the American worker. Where would China be today without American corporations outsourcing the manufacturing of their products the past several decades? Something should've been done to curb this decades ago. However, this isn't all corporations and the benefits of trickle down economics have still been felt not only through the countless technological innovations we enjoy in our everyday lives but the millions of middle class people who've done well working a 40 hour week and owning a house, multiple vehicles and raising their kids.
Quote from: KingDrool on 09/06/2017, 10:45 AMWalMart, McDonalds provide millions of jobs, sure. Millions of jobs that don't pay a living wage and give horseshit benefits, if any at all. You sure you want to hold up the Waltons as your example of how "trickle down economics" works? Are you positive, man? McDonald's? Really?I used them as an example because A), that's generally where people go to complain about a "living wage" and B), because they're among the largest employers in America. Flipping burgers isn't meant to be a career. Do you really think someone should be able to walk in the door and make $15 an hour mopping floors and taking the trash out? Either you bust your ass and work your way up the ladder or use it as a stepping stone towards something better. If you're content to work fast food until you retire because you have no aspirations in life, that's your problem.
QuoteI'll help you out here: next time you make this argument, maybe use Costco as an example. You know, a company who has a CEO who makes a decent and reasonable living and pays its employees well and gives them good benefits. Don't use two of the most notorious corporations in the country.Don't get me wrong, it pisses me off too when I see the pay of CEOs skyrocketing versus how much money they pay their employees. As mentioned before, I pointed them out because they employ so many people and are frequent targets of the "living wage" advocates, whatever that means. What's a living wage? Is $15 really a living wage? How about $20? Fuck it. $50 an hour, full insurance, weekends off for the kids, and a company car and apartment. There's your utopia. Just don't get mad when a hamburger costs $100 and gas is $50 a gallon.
QuoteThen we move on to the "fuck those poor people and illegal immigrants stealing our jobs" argument. Are there people who abuse the system? Sure as hell there are. Are they to blame for your job losses while those poor, abused CEOs and wealthy are over-taxed, demonized, and forced to send low-paying jobs overseas? Come on, man. Give me a break. They don't send those jobs overseas because they're overtaxed. They send them overseas because they can pay some Chinese kid pennies on the dollar to make their products. Those jobs aren't coming back unless our minimum wage goes away, despite what our Dipshit in Chief says. He's just scapegoating.I love how you casually dismiss the impact of all the social programs on the budget. Our social programs account for over half of the budget. We now have generations of people living off of the government and we're importing millions more year after year. As for the jobs going overseas, yes, I hate the fact that so many companies have moved their factories. However, unions are partially responsible for a lot of the outsourcing. Yes, unions are supposed to protect workers and fight for better wages, benefits, etc. However, in some cases demands are too high and lead to companies closing or sending jobs elsewhere. I'm not anti-union because I do think workers need protection from abuses and deserve to be paid a reasonable wage for the jobs they do, and that doesn't mean $15 an hour for greeting people at the front door.
QuoteThe tax rate for corporations are statutory and a really good bit of red herring to dangle in front of suckers willing to believe that the poor and immigrants are to blame for their woes. Corporations use deductions and credits, and wind up paying waaaaay less than 38%. They're not getting their taxes done by an intern at H&R Block, my friend.After deductions and credits the effective tax rate for most corporations is about 25%, which is still higher that many other comparable countries like Great Britain, France and other G-7 nations. Plus, one of the main things that is being discussed is eliminating the tax loopholes and credits used by the wealthy, which is a good thing, right? Higher tax rates doesn't necessarily mean more tax revenue and can have a negative effect on the economy. You want to talk about victimhood? It gets tiresome hearing the burger flipping high school dropout spending $5 a day on a pack of cigarettes bitch and moan about "the man" and how the evil corporations screwed them over.
QuotePoor, abused corporations. They wanna give jobs to the poor. But the evil government won't let them. And the Walton family are just soooo upset about not being able to pay their employees a living wage. But the evil government won't let them.You and your corporate boogeyman syndrome. Without corporations, where are you going to get your IPhone? Where are you going to shop for food and clothes? Who's going to make your video games? Business is not a charity. No business is obligated to hire more people than they want to nor pay a legion of dumbasses $15 an hour to stand around flapping their gums and checking their phones every ten minutes, which is unfortunately what our society has transformed into. Seriously, there is a substantial number of people who have zero work ethic and never will, and to arbitrarily grant them some massive raise rather than base it upon merit is ridiculous. It's the liberal thing to do but still ridiculous.
QuoteNow let's be fair, I've whipped hard to the left to respond to your hard right assertions. But the answer, as always, lies somewhere in the middle. Again, Costco is a great example of capitalism and "trickle down" done right. But you've gotta be reasonable about it. Corporate greed is real, just as entitlement abuse is real. The only difference is that corporate greed costs our country far more than a handful - or even "millions" - of poor people cashing $500 welfare checks every month.I agree that corporate greed is real and I would love to see things done to stop abuses. I'd love to see all the loopholes closed and things put in place to discourage American companies from outsourcing jobs. However, with that said, I think it's time to start weaning Americans off of government programs and take care of only the most desperate of people. Importing millions of unskilled, uneducated people with nothing but the shirt on their backs just because America has a white guilt complex isn't good for the economy or the country as a whole.
Quote from: seieienbu on 08/31/2017, 06:12 PMTrickle down economics doesn't work. Giving a tax break to people who already hide money in foreign banks gives them more money to hide in foreign banks. Raising taxes on the super rich and on corporations can allow the government to spend money and put it in the hands of Americans like teachers, construction workers, soldiers, police, etc.Bullshit. "Trickle down economics" is the ONLY system that works. Industry creates wealth. Industry creates jobs. The government doesn't create wealth, it only takes wealth. As much as you might not like corporations like Wal-Mart, McDonalds, Home Depot or whatever, they provide millions of jobs and service millions of people. As we're seeing in so many socialist countries in Western Europe where social programs and high taxation have stalled their economies and lead them to financial ruin, the same thing has happened to the United States. The rich already pay the majority of taxes while half of Americans pay no federal taxes and often receive more in benefits than they've ever paid in. In case you haven't noticed the government receives trillions of dollars in tax revenue and still our infrastructure and education systems are crap. The government could confiscate all the wealth of all the billionaires and they'd still blow it. Now, I'm all for closing loopholes used to avoid paying taxes but this whole "fair share" stuff is bullshit. We have millions of people fucking their lives up, flunking school, having kids they can't afford, get fucked up on drugs, etc etc etc and the American taxpayer is expected to take care of them, not to mention the illegal immigrants competing for low wage jobs, burdening the education system, receiving benefits that they shouldn't be eligible for, etc. We already spend a substantial amount of the budget on countless government programs and we're headed over the cliff with ballooning Social Security costs. What was meant to be safety net programs have become a way of life for millions and we're pretty much screwed because of it.
We can have better education, infrastructure, and defense or the multi billionaires can add more zeroes to their bank accounts. I think one idea is better than the other but maybe I'm not being fair to the multi billionaires and should put myself in their shoes before arguing over the internet about taxation.
Quote from: guest on 10/31/2016, 04:50 PMAh no fuck this thread! I hate that it just got bumped again. I want one so bad but don't quite have the money for it right now.You're not missing much. I've owned two of them and while they look cool as hell in your entertainment center, they're not really worth the money. The picture quality for LD movie playback isn't that good compared to other cheaper LD players, the PACs are too expensive, especially the NEC PACs, and the handful of LD games that are worth a damn are exorbitantly priced, like Road Prosecutor and Time Gal.
Must. Resist. Urge. To. Just. Buy. One. Anyway.