10/31/2023: Localization News - Dead of the Brain 1!

No, NOT a trick, a Halloween treat! Presenting the Dead of the Brain 1 English patch by David Shadoff for the DEAD last official PC Engine CD game published by NEC before exiting the console biz in 1999! I helped edit/betatest and it's also a game I actually finished in 2023, yaaay! Shubibiman also did a French localization. github.com/dshadoff/DeadoftheBrain
twitter.com/NightWolve/PCENews
Main Menu

PAL development

Started by Lum, 03/04/2015, 08:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Lum

Has anybody actually tried to write program code for the PAL TG16? I've said before I don't believe any exists. It'd be nice to at least have a tech demo of how real 50hz games would've performed.

Opethian

I don't know of anyone that owns a PAL TG and actually uses it. Its more of a collector item or oddity  if anything.
IMG

wildfruit

I have one and I use it. I am an oddity. Also I know nothing of programming made a half arse attempt at doing c++ about 25 years ago and I've forgot It all.

CrackTiger

It doesn't run games correctly, so there's no reason to use a PAL TurboGrafx other than to see how much it messes up any particular game.

With that said, I'd love to see some PAL demos, especially if it allows for something special like decent 3D graphics.
Justin the Not-So-Cheery Black/Hack/CrackTiger helped Joshua Jackass, Andrew/Arkhan Dildovich and the DildoPhiles destroy 2 PC Engine groups: one by Aaron Lambert on Facebook, then the other by Aaron Nanto!!! Him and PCE Aarons don't have a good track record together! Both times he blamed the Aarons and their staff in a "Look-what-you-made-us-do?!" manner, never himself nor his deranged/destructive/doxxing toxic turbo troll gang which he covers up for under the "community" euphemism!

wildfruit

Quote from: guest on 03/04/2015, 11:59 AMIt doesn't run games correctly, so there's no reason to use a PAL TurboGrafx other than to see how much it messes up any particular game.
I've never noticed anything other than slowdown. Never had an issue with a game glitching or the like. Unless you know of something specific and ill look out for it? I understand that someone who has played at 60hz before would get pissed off at 50hz but I'm used to it ( nes, master system, mega drive, snes etc ) the only game i ever thought was majorly gimped in 50hz was sonic the hedgehog. That was a real eye opener playing it at proper speed for the first time.

Nazi NecroPhile

Quote from: Opethian on 03/04/2015, 08:54 AMI don't know of anyone that owns a PAL TG and actually uses it. Its more of a collector item or oddity  if anything.
Yep.  Mine sits in the closet, both because I have nothing that'll it'll play on and because who'd play on such a thing when they've got a Duo handy?
Ultimate Forum Bully/Thief/Saboteur/Clone Warrior! BURN IN HELL NECROPHUCK!!!

DragonmasterDan

Quote from: Opethian on 03/04/2015, 08:54 AMI don't know of anyone that owns a PAL TG and actually uses it. Its more of a collector item or oddity  if anything.
I have one and HAVE used it.

But there's nothing specific to programming for it. It just runs regular TurboGrafx 16 games, just a bit slower.
--DragonmasterDan

Arkhan Asylum

#7
Quote from: Lum on 03/04/2015, 08:30 AMHas anybody actually tried to write program code for the PAL TG16? I've said before I don't believe any exists. It'd be nice to at least have a tech demo of how real 50hz games would've performed.
They would perform the same as a 60hz game.

If it was written FOR PAL, it's reasonable to assume the developers would have tweaked the game during playtesting to play well.   

So, it's kind of a moot point.

For example, lets say I wrote Atlantean for PAL.   The end result would be the same. 

The songs were written externally, so naturally, you would tweak the tempo so it sounds right (Similar to how if you play a PCE game on a PAL system, the songs are slower.   I would adjust the tempo to compensate and fix this).

Then, the gameplay itself would have gone through the same playtesting and tweaking until it feels right.

Under the covers, the numbers would be different.   Other than that, it'd play the same.


If you're curious how actual, commercially released PAL games play, go look at European C64/MSX games.  Those were generally all written for PAL.


Oh, I could be mistaken because I hate the game, but Turrican on Turbo Grafx might be running too fast since it's a PAL game.

Compare it to the Amiga one and see, I guess. 

At a quick glance, the tunes seem to be going too fast on Turbo Grafx.


So, Turrican TG16 might play less shittily on a PAL system.

It will still suck because it's Turrican though.
This "max-level forum psycho" (:lol:) destroyed TWO PC Engine groups in rage: one by Aaron Lambert on Facebook "Because Chris 'Shadowland' Runyon!," then the other by Aaron Nanto "Because Le NightWolve!" Him and PCE Aarons don't have a good track record together... Both times he blamed the Aarons in a "Look-what-you-made-us-do?!" manner, never himself nor his deranged, destructive, toxic turbo troll gang!

xcrement5x

Quote from: Psycho Arkhan on 03/04/2015, 01:39 PMIt will still suck because it's Turrican though.
At least it's not Universal Soldier... :(
Demented Clone Warrior Consensus: "My pirated forum clone is superior/more "moral" than yours, neener neener neener..."  ](*,)

CrackTiger

Quote from: wildfruit on 03/04/2015, 12:45 PM
Quote from: CrackTiger on 03/04/2015, 11:59 AMIt doesn't run games correctly, so there's no reason to use a PAL TurboGrafx other than to see how much it messes up any particular game.
I've never noticed anything other than slowdown. Never had an issue with a game glitching or the like. Unless you know of something specific and ill look out for it? I understand that someone who has played at 60hz before would get pissed off at 50hz but I'm used to it ( nes, master system, mega drive, snes etc ) the only game i ever thought was majorly gimped in 50hz was sonic the hedgehog. That was a real eye opener playing it at proper speed for the first time.
It's weird that you're so forgiving of games running at the wrong speed, but got so upset that a console made for NTSC regions at a time when 95% of users were only using RF connections... only came with lowly composite output. :shock:

Turbo/PCE games don't slowdown more on the PAL TurboGrafx, they just run slower the entire time. Some are more noticeable than others. So games don't look, sound or play as intended.

But this is a console defined by its CD library and redbook audio doesn't slowdown for PAL speed (not in my tests anyway). I imagine that there are other complications, but having all of your dialogue, cinematics, various sound effects and other things way out of sync really breaks the experience.

You might as well just stick to emulation as it's a far more accurate experience.
Justin the Not-So-Cheery Black/Hack/CrackTiger helped Joshua Jackass, Andrew/Arkhan Dildovich and the DildoPhiles destroy 2 PC Engine groups: one by Aaron Lambert on Facebook, then the other by Aaron Nanto!!! Him and PCE Aarons don't have a good track record together! Both times he blamed the Aarons and their staff in a "Look-what-you-made-us-do?!" manner, never himself nor his deranged/destructive/doxxing toxic turbo troll gang which he covers up for under the "community" euphemism!

Bloufo

I own one as well.
It's relegated to shits & giggles territory.
Like mixing and matching and seeing which fits into what. ;p

PALVistarTurboGrafx-16CD.webp

Psycho Punch

Wasn't the PALGrafx incompatible with the CDROM addon?
This Toxic Turbo Turd/Troll & Clone Warrior calls himself "Burning Fight!!" at Neo-Geo.com
For a good time reach out to: aleffrenan94@gmail.com or punchballmariobros@gmail.com
Like DildoKobold, dildos are provided free of charge, no need to bring your own! :lol:
He too ran scripts to steal/clone this forum which blew up the error logs! I deleted THOUSANDS of errors cause of this nutcase!
how_to_spell_ys_sign_origin_ver.webp

Bloufo

^^
That setup does work.

xcrement5x

Quote from: Bloufo on 03/05/2015, 12:11 AMI own one as well.
It's relegated to shits & giggles territory.
Like mixing and matching and seeing which fits into what. ;p
PALVistarTurboGrafx-16CD.webp
:( Reminds me of Breetai :(
Demented Clone Warrior Consensus: "My pirated forum clone is superior/more "moral" than yours, neener neener neener..."  ](*,)

esteban

Insanity plays best in PAL.
IMGIMG IMG  |  IMG  |  IMG IMG

Bloufo

Quote from: guest on 03/05/2015, 02:31 PM:( Reminds me of Breetai :(
Yeah he loved everything Turbo related. Would definitely get a kick out of that.
Tragic how he went out.  :(

BTW, he went by the tag here of 'Firebomber7', right?

xcrement5x

Ya, he was on chat as Breetai a lot too though.  Anyway, sorry.  Didn't mean to bring down the thread.
Demented Clone Warrior Consensus: "My pirated forum clone is superior/more "moral" than yours, neener neener neener..."  ](*,)

Arkhan Asylum

Quote from: guest on 03/06/2015, 03:53 PMYa, he was on chat as Breetai a lot too though.  Anyway, sorry.  Didn't mean to bring down the thread.
WAY TO GO, FAG.
This "max-level forum psycho" (:lol:) destroyed TWO PC Engine groups in rage: one by Aaron Lambert on Facebook "Because Chris 'Shadowland' Runyon!," then the other by Aaron Nanto "Because Le NightWolve!" Him and PCE Aarons don't have a good track record together... Both times he blamed the Aarons in a "Look-what-you-made-us-do?!" manner, never himself nor his deranged, destructive, toxic turbo troll gang!

A Black Falcon

It's pretty amusing that a European Turbografx works with a Japanese CD unit through a US base unit... good stuff. :)

Quote from: guest on 03/04/2015, 04:41 PM
Quote from: guest on 03/04/2015, 01:39 PMIt will still suck because it's Turrican though.
At least it's not Universal Soldier... :(
What about Universal Soldier (the Genesis game, I presume)?  It's a great port of a fantastic game!  Sure, it'd have been nice if the shmup levels hadn't been cut out of Turrican 2, but otherwise it's all there and done very well.  I don't care about the altered sprites, it's the same great game.  (Turrican 2 is a huge, huge improvement over the interesting but flawed first game... the first game is okay, but from 2 on the series is really, really good.)

Damon Plus

I have one and use it regularly. As I've only played in PAL format, I don't notice the games run slower or anything (just like I didn't notice back in the day with the Mega Drive, for example).

TurboXray

I've never had a PAL TG unit, but I remember talking with someone who had access to one (Charles Macdonald). It's not a 'normal' PAL setup - it's all hack-ish. IIRC, you don't get the added benefit that most PAL systems get (additional cpu cycles per frame, because it's normally speed/tv_frame_rate = cpu resource per frame). I remember something about it being stalled for long period of time (cpu, for a number of scanlines). Anyway, hack-ish. That said, I always wanted one to do tests on.

 It technically has a z80 mcu on it (one more 8bit processor), but you don't have access to it because it's busy making a legal PAL video signal from a hacked up NTSC one. It's wackadoo.

esteban

Quote from: TurboXray on 03/11/2015, 05:26 PMI've never had a PAL TG unit, but I remember talking with someone who had access to one (Charles Macdonald). It's not a 'normal' PAL setup - it's all hack-ish. IIRC, you don't get the added benefit that most PAL systems get (additional cpu cycles per frame, because it's normally speed/tv_frame_rate = cpu resource per frame). I remember something about it being stalled for long period of time (cpu, for a number of scanlines). Anyway, hack-ish. That said, I always wanted one to do tests on.

 It technically has a z80 mcu on it (one more 8bit processor), but you don't have access to it because it's busy making a legal PAL video signal from a hacked up NTSC one. It's wackadoo.
Seems like an awful lot of work to get rid of TG-16 hardware.
IMGIMG IMG  |  IMG  |  IMG IMG

DragonmasterDan

Quote from: esteban on 03/11/2015, 05:57 PMSeems like an awful lot of work to get rid of TG-16 hardware.
I'm not sure if I'm interpreting your statement correctly.

I read it as "This sounds like too much effort for NEC simply trying to dump unsold US TurboGrafx 16s on the Europeans".

The PAL TurboGrafx uses a different color casing, different AV connector among many other things.

These were not simply hacked together by NEC to get rid of extra TG16s lying around their warehouses. This is clearly a factory made, PAL specific design with NEC's name printed all over it, from the outside to the internals. Not a hackjob of any kind, and not done by a third party.
--DragonmasterDan

esteban

Quote from: DragonmasterDan on 03/15/2015, 12:35 AM
Quote from: esteban on 03/11/2015, 05:57 PMSeems like an awful lot of work to get rid of TG-16 hardware.
I'm not sure if I'm interpreting your statement correctly.

I read it as "This sounds like too much effort for NEC simply trying to dump unsold US TurboGrafx 16s on the Europeans".

The PAL TurboGrafx uses a different color casing, different AV connector among many other things.

These were not simply hacked together by NEC to get rid of extra TG16s lying around their warehouses. This is clearly a factory made, PAL specific design with NEC's name printed all over it, from the outside to the internals. Not a hackjob of any kind, and not done by a third party.
Yeah, I might be wrong. Or completely wrong. :)

You interpreted my statement properly, as I intended.



---------- My thoughts, elaborated --------------

I put PAL TG in the same category as the Vistar...it seems that both PAL TG and Vistar were attempts to find uses for key components of TG-16 hardware...as if the internal components were sitting in a stockpile, unused, with no upcoming orders...and an accountant says, "We should do something with all this stuff. It will be a loss, otherwise. Write up a proposal, let's figure out if we can make a profit with minimal additional expenditures."

Basically, an attempt to salvage...

Of course, I could be wrong (focusing on hardware)  when I should be thinking about the SOFTWARE! Maybe the real issue was a huge stockpile of NA HuCARD's!

If that was the case, I could see PAL and Vistar hardware in a completely new way. PAL and Vistar hardware might very well have represented a *risky gamble* that would have provided a modest hardware profit, at best, but ultimately payoff in the long-run if overstock NA HuCARD's were selling in Europe/South Korea.

--------------- Problems ---------------

Many of my assertions could be overreaching: I assume motivation was either salvaging overstocked hardware and/or overstocked software.

(1) what NA titles would appeal to Europe/SK? Were these the same titles that were overstocked?

(2) maybe PAL began as a SERIOUS endeavor, but later, market realities forced NEC to change plans.

(3) I am completely wrong on everything.

:)
IMGIMG IMG  |  IMG  |  IMG IMG

DragonmasterDan

#24
Quote from: esteban on 03/15/2015, 08:29 AM---------- My thoughts, elaborated --------------

I put PAL TG in the same category as the Vistar...it seems that both PAL TG and Vistar were attempts to find uses for key components of TG-16 hardware...as if the internal components were sitting in a stockpile, unused, with no upcoming orders...and an accountant says, "We should do something with all this stuff. It will be a loss, otherwise. Write up a proposal, let's figure out if we can make a profit with minimal additional expenditures."

Basically, an attempt to salvage...

Of course, I could be wrong (focusing on hardware)  when I should be thinking about the SOFTWARE! Maybe the real issue was a huge stockpile of NA HuCARD's!
From what I could tell these were manufactured around 1990. By that time NEC was certainly disappointed with the TG's sales in North America. But by no means were they just looking to bulk unload or give up. As mentioned this is a completely different PCB revision motherboard, using some different chips. A different plastic casing not just for the system but the controller (same mold though), even a new logo for the PAL unit.

QuoteIf that was the case, I could see PAL and Vistar hardware in a completely new way. PAL and Vistar hardware might very well have represented a *risky gamble* that would have provided a modest hardware profit, at best, but ultimately payoff in the long-run if overstock NA HuCARD's were selling in Europe/South Korea.
The Vistar seems to have hit the market around 1992, and is far more likely to have been an attempt to salvage or re-use unsold stock by selling it to a third party in Korea to market it locally.

Quote--------------- Problems ---------------

Many of my assertions could be overreaching: I assume motivation was either salvaging overstocked hardware and/or overstocked software.

(1) what NA titles would appeal to Europe/SK? Were these the same titles that were overstocked?

(2) maybe PAL began as a SERIOUS endeavor, but later, market realities forced NEC to change plans.

(3) I am completely wrong on everything.

:)
I'm pretty sure the PAL release started as a serious plan, they designed a new logo, they designed a PCB with a different crystal and different chips to use, they dropped the 16 from the systems name. They test marketed it and... it didn't do so well, so however many units they initially manufactured were all that would see the light of day and most of the unsold ones showed up years later as New Old Stock.
--DragonmasterDan

YANDMAN

pc engine cd always maes me think of  daft punk helmet

esteban

Quote from: YANDMAN on 03/17/2015, 04:23 PMpc engine cd always maes me think of  daft punk helmet
Comrade, you have it reversed!

IMG

Daft Punk makes EVERYONE think of PCE
IMGIMG IMG  |  IMG  |  IMG IMG