PCEngine-FX.com

NEC PC Engine/TurboGrafx-16 Games/Consoles => PCE/TG-16|CD/SGX Discussion => Topic started by: Kitsunexus on 12/27/2007, 10:42 PM

Title: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: Kitsunexus on 12/27/2007, 10:42 PM
Who programmed the TG-16 emulator in the Wii, Nintendo or Hudson???
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: Keranu on 12/29/2007, 03:18 AM
Why do you want to know, so you know who's ass to kick?  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: guyjin on 12/29/2007, 02:56 PM
We don't know. I think the emulation might even be done on a per-game basis (see the military madness scandal)
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: Kitsunexus on 12/29/2007, 05:24 PM
Because Hudson would know the system better...
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: nat on 12/29/2007, 06:04 PM
This is a good question.

I've actually been wondering about ALL the emulators on the VC. Who develops them? I'm kind of surprised no credit is given anywhere.
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: Kitsunexus on 12/30/2007, 02:52 AM
Quote from: nat on 12/29/2007, 06:04 PMThis is a good question.

I've actually been wondering about ALL the emulators on the VC. Who develops them? I'm kind of surprised no credit is given anywhere.
Seriously, did Sega make the Sega emulators, did Hudson make the TG-16 emulator, did SNK make the Neo·Geo emulator?

Because if Nintendo made them all, they won't be as good because Nintendo doesn't know the other systems like they do.
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: Kitsunexus on 12/30/2007, 02:53 AM
Quote from: guyjin on 12/29/2007, 02:56 PMI think the emulation might even be done on a per-game basis.
This makes sense as it would explain why the games take so long to store on an SD card.
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: nat on 12/30/2007, 04:39 AM
I don't know, the emulation on the VC seems to be pretty damn flawless as far as I can tell. Neo Geo, Genesis, etc all play, look and sound exactly the same as the consoles. Except in 480p.
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: BigT on 01/18/2008, 01:34 AM
Nintendo or Hudson Soft most likely hired some guys with emulation experience to do the programming for them.

From what I've seen, the emulation works well. But, I still don't like the concept of re-buying games that I already own.  I'll stick to Magic Engine on the PC, which is more convenient: I can use my own CDs and it supports almost every game flawlessly with superior filtering of graphics and sound.
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: guyjin on 01/18/2008, 02:39 AM
Quote from: Kitsunexus on 12/30/2007, 02:52 AMBecause if Nintendo made them all, they won't be as good because Nintendo doesn't know the other systems like they do.
clearly, you haven't played 'sega classics collection, volume 1'. Horrible, horrible sound emulation. written by sega, when better open source genesis emulators existed.
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: nat on 01/18/2008, 10:56 AM
Yeah, what's up with that? I have the Dreamcast version and some games I won't even play because the sound is so bad. They made it sound like bad NES sound. It's hard to explain, but that's the best way I can describe it.

How did they think releasing it in that condition would be OK?
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: guyjin on 01/18/2008, 12:15 PM
i don't know what they were thinking. it came around in the final months of the dreamcast, so maybe budget problems were involved.
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: Turbo D on 03/05/2008, 04:06 PM
lol, I was so stoked about that game. When I got it, all of my friends made fun of it. They said that my dreamcast couldn't handle genesis games  :x
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: Joe Redifer on 03/05/2008, 09:08 PM
The emulation is probably farmed out to losers like Digital Eclipse who make sure the emulation is as awful as possible.
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: TurboXray on 03/08/2008, 07:29 PM
Hudson of Japan is handling the emulation. It's probably in house since Hudson has always been into software development. They've done many of projects for other companies (like nintendo, x68 OS, etc), so I wouldn't see why they would out source it.
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: SignOfZeta on 03/08/2008, 08:27 PM
Quote from: Kitsunexus on 12/29/2007, 05:24 PMBecause Hudson would know the system better...
I wouldn't count on that. All the PCE people are probably either gone or promoted to positions way above lowly coding. That stuff was ages ago. They would have (probably) lots of technical documentation, but they could just send that to some other company if they wanted to.
Title: Re: Virtual Console TG-16 question...
Post by: guyjin on 03/10/2008, 05:00 PM
Quote from: TurboXray on 03/08/2008, 07:29 PMHudson of Japan is handling the emulation. It's probably in house since Hudson has always been into software development. They've done many of projects for other companies (like nintendo, x68 OS, etc), so I wouldn't see why they would out source it.
do you have any proof?