Instances where the PCE port of a game sucked hard

Gogan · 11/14/2010, 07:15 PM

Only difference in these comparisions is,.... SF2 was good, SF1 was bad, LA1 was good, LA2 was bad. Lol

Ps.I use "bad" loosely as I like all the games mentioned in this post

Tatsujin · 11/14/2010, 08:09 PM

Quote from: Psycho Arkhan on 11/14/2010, 02:16 PM
Quote from: Tatsujin on 11/14/2010, 07:56 AMYou just answered to your own question. Bravo
no... I just explained why its ok to compare the two games? If you think one game sucking and doing it wrong and the next one being good means you can't compare the two, then I don't know what to tell you.

Lol, you can compare what ever and everything you like. Thats not the point. The point is, they are so completely different in almost every aspect. Not just good/bad. And that mostly due to the era difference.
And between end 80s and early 90s, 4 years was a huge gap imo.

Arkhan Asylum · 11/15/2010, 12:11 AM

so we're not allowed to compare games of the same series, namely the first to any of its successors, in the event that the first one sucks.

Tatsujin · 11/15/2010, 12:19 AM

Now you come up with that "because it sucked" ploy again? I have never said that.

Arkhan Asylum · 11/15/2010, 12:35 AM

Quote from: Tatsujin on 11/15/2010, 12:19 AMNow you come up with that "because it sucked" ploy again? I have never said that.

I said it sucks.

You also agreed with me when I said it sucks by quoting what I said and going you just answered your own question!

rag-time4 · 11/15/2010, 12:45 AM

Quote from: Tatsujin on 11/14/2010, 08:09 PM
Quote from: Psycho Arkhan on 11/14/2010, 02:16 PM
Quote from: Tatsujin on 11/14/2010, 07:56 AMYou just answered to your own question. Bravo
no... I just explained why its ok to compare the two games? If you think one game sucking and doing it wrong and the next one being good means you can't compare the two, then I don't know what to tell you.
Lol, you can compare what ever and everything you like. Thats not the point. The point is, they are so completely different in almost every aspect. Not just good/bad. And that mostly due to the era difference.
And between end 80s and early 90s, 4 years was a huge gap imo.

I don't think that Street Fighter 1 and 2 are very different overall. There are some things that Street Fighter 1 did better than Street Fighter 2.

Street Fighter 1 has some awesome backgrounds, with only 2 stinkers (Gen and Birdie), while Street Fighter 2 has less creative backgrounds. Street Fighter 1 also has better music, and many of the various tunes do an awesome job of providing an ethnic / international feel, that immerses you in the international aspect much more than in Street Fighter 2. The only stage music that stands out to me from Street Fighter 2 is Honda's music. I also think that being able to hear your fighter's voice as you throw basic punches and kicks was cool and should have been expanded for Street Fighter 2 rather than dropped entirely.

Tatsujin · 11/15/2010, 12:59 AM

Quote from: Psycho Arkhan on 11/15/2010, 12:35 AM
Quote from: Tatsujin on 11/15/2010, 12:19 AMNow you come up with that "because it sucked" ploy again? I have never said that.
I said it sucks.

You also agreed with me when I said it sucks by quoting what I said and going you just answered your own question!

I also have never argued the converse. But as I said, that also was never the point.

Arkhan Asylum · 11/15/2010, 01:08 AM

your point was 4 years of time is too far of a gap to compare the first and second game in a series.

Tatsujin · 11/15/2010, 01:36 AM

Quote from: Psycho Arkhan on 11/15/2010, 01:08 AMyour point was 4 years of time is too far of a gap to compare the first and second game in a series.

No, not the first and second game in a series, but Street Fighter (1) and Street Fighter II. Right.

Duo_R · 11/15/2010, 01:44 AM

Well are you comparing to Street Fighter 1 Champion Edition or normal SF1? Lol

Mathius · 11/15/2010, 01:50 AM

I'm so confused.

Tatsujin · 11/15/2010, 01:52 AM

LOL. And anyway, as always it's a matter of opinions, and this is my personal opinion. Or would you like to steal my opinion?

termis · 11/15/2010, 02:18 AM

Quote from: rag-time4 on 11/15/2010, 12:45 AMI don't think that Street Fighter 1 and 2 are very different overall. There are some things that Street Fighter 1 did better than Street Fighter 2.

When I read that, I thought, "You're on crack."

Quote from: rag-time4 on 11/15/2010, 12:45 AMStreet Fighter 1 has some awesome backgrounds, with only 2 stinkers (Gen and Birdie), while Street Fighter 2 has less creative backgrounds. Street Fighter 1 also has better music, and many of the various tunes do an awesome job of providing an ethnic / international feel, that immerses you in the international aspect much more than in Street Fighter 2. The only stage music that stands out to me from Street Fighter 2 is Honda's music. I also think that being able to hear your fighter's voice as you throw basic punches and kicks was cool and should have been expanded for Street Fighter 2 rather than dropped entirely.

Then after reading this, I thought, "Hey, I do agree with a lot of what you're saying."

blueraven · 11/15/2010, 03:56 AM

OK, so The Ninja Warriors doesn't suck.

Also, I have no idea why the fuck people are arguing about Street Fighter(s)

carry on...

Arkhan Asylum · 11/15/2010, 05:22 PM

Quote from: Tatsujin on 11/15/2010, 01:36 AM
Quote from: Psycho Arkhan on 11/15/2010, 01:08 AMyour point was 4 years of time is too far of a gap to compare the first and second game in a series.
No, not the first and second game in a series, but Street Fighter (1) and Street Fighter II. Right.

same difference. Its generally understood that SFII is the sequel to SFI, so I don't know what technicality nonsense youre talking about. I dont really care either. SF1 sucks. Ryu is a homo. So is Ken.

Brokeback Hadoken.